Collaboration across surgical specialties and lessons from combat casualty care — especially the use of tourniquets and other effective strategies to control bleeding — helped mount an effective surgical response to aid victims of the Boston Marathon bombings, according to an article.
The article, published in the July issue of the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, describes the experience of surgeons who treated victims of the Boston bombings at Brigham and Womens Hospital. E.J. Caterson, MD, PhD, and coauthors wrote about the “intensive surgical resources necessary after a civilian bomb attack.
“Unfortunately, it is likely that more centers will deal with similar events in the future and it is imperative that we as a community of providers take what lessons we can from battlefield medicine and that we collectively prepare for and engage this future.”
Surgeons and staff at BWH mobilized “an exceptional team effort” to treat victims of the attack, which happened April 15 at the Boston Marathon finish line. In the wake of the bombing, BWH received 39 victims, including seven critically injured patients who arrived nearly at once. The first patient was resuscitated and on an operating table only 18 minutes after arriving at the BWH trauma center, and about 35 minutes after the explosion, according to the article.
Thirteen patients underwent emergency surgery within the first few hours after the event. BWH surgeons performed 72 surgeries in a total of 181 hospital days, with the most severely injured patients requiring multiple surgeries. In an intensive effort lasting more than a month, surgeons, residents, nurses and other staff volunteered for extra shifts to reduce the backlog of blast-injured Bostonians requiring surgery.
From “the first moments of hospital care being initiated it was truly a team effort with orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery, trauma surgery and vascular surgery standing shoulder to shoulder in the trauma bays, and together in the operating rooms,” the authors wrote.
They believe that “prepositioned collaborative relationships” among surgical specialties at BWH could provide a useful model of collaboration for responding to mass casualty events in military and civilian settings. With expertise in facial trauma, hand and burn surgery and wound management, plastic surgeons can play a key role in coordinating surgical care, “with a broad perspective on functional recovery.”
The authors also emphasized the “effective transfer” of the lessons of combat casualty care, especially the Tactical Combat Casualty Care course that has grown out of the medical experience in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Foremost among these lessons was the potential to save lives through the effective use of tourniquets to control hemorrhage from missing and mangled limbs.
Quick-clotting military combat gauze plays a similar role in stopping bleeding in places where a tourniquet cannot be used, such as the neck or groin. For internal bleeding, the blood-clotting drug tranexamic acid is effective. Other critically important techniques include fracture splinting and emergency airway management.
“All of these lifesaving lessons should be incorporated into our civilian mindset when we were dealing with casualties of a potential terrorist attack,” the authors wrote.
“If there is any overarching lesson, it is that multidisciplinary teamwork, preparation and dedication are the keys to success in effectively dealing with a mass casualty event,” Caterson and colleagues concluded. “It is important to perform an assessment of performance after such an event to use and disseminate knowledge to make these attacks less effective by making our responses more efficient and effective.”
Study abstract: http://bit.ly/13WTM6J.